From the moment Emerson and Theo met as teenagers, they were inseparable. But just when they finally expressed their feelings to one another, they were torn apart.
Now, supermodel Emerson is nearing her twenty-eighth birthday, and she’s tired of looking for love in all the wrong places. When the calendar reminder for the marriage pact she and Theo made as teens goes off on her phone, she realizes this is it―her chance to rekindle the only romance that ever really made sense. Emerson convinces her grumpy agent to book her as the face of the fashion campaign that Theo, now a fashion photographer, is shooting. The good the campaign is being shot in ridiculously romantic Cinque Terre, Italy. The bad news? Theo might not be as happy to see her as she’d hoped.
The two embark on a four-day campaign that tests not only their feelings, but their ability to keep their hands off one another. But as roadblock after roadblock keeps them apart, Emerson starts to will this photoshoot be the key to getting one last shot at love, or will it be a final goodbye?
I received an ARC of this book in exchange for this review. All thoughts on One Last Shot are my own.
Did Not Finish at 6% (21 pages)
I want you to go ahead and read that book description again. Particularly the line “Theo might not be as happy to see her as she’d hoped.” Maybe even read it a third time. Because that is a complete and utter lie.
It didn’t take me long to realize that this book’s description promised something it wasn’t going to fulfill. Because as our two main characters get the notification on their phones that they made a pact to get married on their 28th birthdays, they also both decide to reach out and find the other after a ten year separation.
Go ahead and read that again too, while we’re at it. They BOTH reach out. The second they get the notification.
Now, its one thing for me to misunderstand a book’s description and realize I’ve made a mistake once I hop into it. I’ve done it before, and I’m sure the possibility to do it again is in my future. But if I can misunderstand a book’s intentions and then go back and find the exact line in the book’s description that states very clearly the same thought process I had?
I went into this book with the understanding that Theo didn’t want to see Emerson again, only to immediately be smacked in the face with his very obvious want to reconnect with her. Paired alongside a very stilted writing style and two characters who were weirdly obsessed with each other, I didn’t even want to give this book a chance to wow me despite its lies.